Modd v. Ottawa, County of et al
| Randall Modd |
| Ottawa, County of, Secure Care, Inc., Gary A. Rosema, Unknown Barr, Ruperto D. Blanco, Jr., Unknown Garvey and Unknown Parties |
| 1:2010cv00337 |
| April 8, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Southern Division (1) Office |
| Muskegon |
| Robert Holmes Bell |
| Magistrate Judge Joseph G. Scoville |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
198
ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 193 , and granting Defendants' motions for summary judgment 131 , 133 ; signed by Judge Robert Holmes Bell (Judge Robert Holmes Bell, kcb)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 27 as the opinion of the Court; Granting in part and denying in part 7 Defendant Ottawa County's and Defendant Rosema's Motion to Dismiss; To the extent it seeks to dismiss Defendan t Gary A. Rosema in his individual capacity, the motion is granted; with respect to all other claims and parties, the motion is denied. Defendant Secure Care, Inc.s Motion to Dismiss, as raised in its Objections (Dkt. No. 29) is denied. The Amended Complaint is dismissed against Defendant Gary A. Rosema in his individual capacity; signed by Judge Robert Holmes Bell (Judge Robert Holmes Bell, kcb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
