Hawkins #205069 v. Norwood et al
| Cecil Hawkins #205069 |
| Unknown Norwood, Robert Groves and Unknown Party |
| 1:2010cv00432 |
| April 30, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Southern Division (1) Office |
| Marquette |
| Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
81
JUDGMENT in favor of defendants against Plaintiff ; signed by Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney (Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney, aeb)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER denying 11 motion for TRO ; signed by Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney (Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney, aeb)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER REGARDING PARTIAL SERVICE: dismissing Counts I,V,VI,VII,VIII, and IX; Defendants Baker, Groves, Chambers, Migliorino, Smith, Benoit, Richardson, Embry, Huss, Tincknell, Edlund, Hofbauer, Russell, Bahrman, Hurrell, Straub, Caron, Place, Napel, C aruso, Klinesmith, Owens, Collette, Mengel, Lewycky, Kero, Ramey, Rothermel, McCarthy and John/Jane Doe #3, #4, and #5 are also dismissed; within 14 days, plaintiff shall file a copy of this order and sufficient additional copies of the complaint for service upon the remaining defendants; upon receipt of the copies, the Clerk is to arrange for service of this order and the complaint upon the remaining defendants ; signed by Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney (Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney, aeb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
