Rosema v. National Football League Players Association et al
| Roger Rosema |
| National Football League Players Association, Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Retirement Plan Benefits Administrators, The and Arizona Cardinals Football Club, The |
| 1:2010cv00777 |
| August 5, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Southern Division (1) Office |
| Kent |
| Paul L. Maloney |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Copy of portion of docket sheet containing information regarding 8/12/10 Order Referring Motion 7 to Magistrate Judge (Non-Document) and Order on Stipulation and Proposed Order 9 sent via U.S. Mail to James R. Acho (bd) |
Filing 9
ORDER granting STIPULATION 7 extending time to respond to complaint until 9/1/2010; signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph G. Scoville (Magistrate Judge Joseph G. Scoville, mmh)
|
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by defendant Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Retirement Plan Benefits Administrators, The re STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER by defendant Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Retirement Plan Benefits Administrators, The 7 (Wernstrom, James) |
| Filing 7 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER by defendant Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Retirement Plan Benefits Administrators, The (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Wernstrom, James) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ORDER REFERRING STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER by defendant Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Retirement Plan Benefits Administrators, The 7 to Magistrate Judge Joseph G. Scoville pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A)(Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney, acr) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY ADMISSION LETTER sent to attorney James R. Acho; attorney admission deadline set for 9/7/2010; (bd) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of receipt of case to all counsel (bd) |
| Copy of Receipt of Case Notice 5 and Attorney Admission Letter 6 sent via U.S. Mail to James R. Acho (bd) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by defendant Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Retirement Plan Benefits Administrators, The re Corporate Disclosure Statement 3 , Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, 2 , Notice of Removal, 1 (replaces docket entry 4 ) (bd) |
| Filing 4 (DISREGARD) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by defendant Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Retirement Plan Benefits Administrators, The re Corporate Disclosure Statement 3 , Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, 2 , Notice of Removal, 1 (bd) Modified text on 8/12/2010; incorrect document uploaded with this entry; replaced by docket entry 10 (bd). |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Retirement Plan Benefits Administrators, The (bd) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING notice of removal re 1 directed to Kent County Circuit Court, James R. Acho, National Football League Players Association by defendant Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Retirement Plan Benefits Administrators, The (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2)(bd) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Kent County Circuit Court case number 10-06763-CK filed by Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Retirement Plan Benefits Administrators, The (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1-a: State Court Summons, # 2 Exhibit 1-b: State Court Complaint and Jury Demand, # 3 Exhibit 1-c: Attachments to State Court Complaint, # 4 Exhibit 2: Consent to Removal, # 5 Civil Cover Sheet)(bd) |
| RECEIPT: in the amount of $350.00, receipt number GR021203; for filing fee (bd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
