Neal #330118 v. Ellis et al
Terry William Neal #330118 |
Unknown Ellis, B. Hofner, Dan Hawkins, M. Cooley, Unknown Boatman, Unknown Saunders, Unknown Cooley and Unknown Thompson |
1:2010cv01075 |
November 2, 2010 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Southern Division (1) Office |
Ionia |
Gordon J. Quist |
Hugh W. Brenneman |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 104 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 103 re 96 ; signed by Judge Gordon J. Quist (Judge Gordon J. Quist, jmt) |
Filing 80 ORDER ADDRESSING ISSUES ON REMAND: Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 58 is again ADOPTED and Defendant's Motion 49 for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim is GRANTED; Plaintiff's retaliation claim is REMANDED to the Magistrate Judge; signed by Judge Gordon J. Quist (Judge Gordon J. Quist, jmt) |
Filing 63 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 58 re 49 ; case closed; signed by Judge Gordon J. Quist (Judge Gordon J. Quist, jmt) |
Filing 22 ORDER ADOPTING IN PART AND REJECTING AND REMANDING IN PART REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 20 re 17 : Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 17 is GRANTED IN PART and the excessive force claim is REMANDED to the Magistrate Judge; signed by Judge Gordon J. Quist (Judge Gordon J. Quist, jmt) |
Filing 8 OPINION; signed by Judge Gordon J. Quist (Judge Gordon J. Quist, jmt) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.