Keggs v. Law Office of Vincent P. Cignarale, LLC.
Plaintiff: Keith Keggs
Defendant: Law Office of Vincent P. Cignarale, LLC
Case Number: 1:2011cv00636
Filed: June 16, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Office: Southern Division (1) Office
County: Osceola
Presiding Judge: Paul L. Maloney
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 8, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 11 DEFAULT JUDGMENT in favor of plaintff and against defendant; signed by Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney (Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney, acr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Keggs v. Law Office of Vincent P. Cignarale, LLC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Law Office of Vincent P. Cignarale, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Keith Keggs
Represented By: David Michael Marco
Represented By: Larry P. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?