Cribbs #715114 et al v. Case et al
| Kameaka Tate and Corey J. Cribbs #715114, II |
| Steven E. Parks, Stephen Bush, Unknown Party #1, Unknown Party #2, Battle Creek Police Department and Joel Case |
| 1:2011cv00713 |
| July 12, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Southern Division (1) Office |
| Ionia |
| Ellen S. Carmody |
| Janet T. Neff |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING IN PART AND REJECTING IN PART REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 29 ; Defendant City of Battle Creek Police Department's motion to dismiss 13 is GRANTED as to Plaintiff Tate and DISMISSED AS MOOT as to Plaintiff Cribbs; Defendant Case's Motion to Dismiss 16 is GRANTED as to Plaintiff Tate and DISMISSED AS MOOT as to Plaintiff Cribbs; Judgment to issue; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, clb)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re Defendant City of Battle Creek Police Department's Motion to Dismiss 13 , and Defendant Case's Motion to Dismiss 16 ; Plaintiffs are hereby ordered to show cause why Defendants' motions should not be granted; responses due by 4/19/2012; signed by Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody (Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody, jal)
|
|
Filing
9
OPINION; Order to issue; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, clb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
