Nadell v. Jack Cooper Transport Company, Inc.
| David A. Nadell |
| Jack Cooper Transport Company, Inc. |
| 1:2012cv01154 |
| October 23, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Southern Division (1) Office |
| Jackson |
| Gordon J. Quist |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 American Disability Act for Handicappers |
| Plaintiff |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Nadell v. Jack Cooper Transport Company, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: David A. Nadell | |
| Represented By: | Brian Edward Koncius |
| Represented By: | Kathleen L. Bogas |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Jack Cooper Transport Company, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Donelle Renee Buratto |
| Represented By: | Martin Charles Brook |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
