Lamie et al v. Wright et al
Ervin Joseph Lamie, Jr. and Estate of Ervin Joseph Lamie, Sr., The |
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Muriel D. LaMie, Fifth Third Bank, Rachael Cereska, Greg Smith, Pamela Sue Smith, David W. LaMie and Paul Wright |
1:2012cv01299 |
November 27, 2012 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Southern Division (1) Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Paul L. Maloney |
Joseph G. Scoville |
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 124 JUDGMENT in favor of all defendants and against plaintiff; signed by Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney (Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney, acr) |
Filing 120 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 111 ; the motions to dismiss 25 , 70 and 96 and the motions for summary judgment 77 and 92 are GRANTED; claims against Defendants David LaMie, Greg Smith, Pamela Smith, Muriel LaMie, Freddie Mac are DISMISSED and these Defendants are TERMINATED; the motions for sanctions 53 , 67 and 102 are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff's privilege of proceeding in forma pauperis in the federal courts with regard to any future lawsuits involving one or more of the parties to this lawsuit or involving either the Taft Road or Wilson Road properties is REVOKED; signed by Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney (Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney, kw) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.