Mixon v. Bronson Health Care Group, Inc. et al
| Keturah Mixon |
| Bronson Health Care Group, Inc. and Bronson Battle Creek Hospital |
| 1:2013cv00843 |
| August 6, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Southern Division (1) Office |
| Calhoun |
| Ellen S. Carmody |
| Janet T. Neff |
| Personal Injury: Health Care |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
109
OPINION AND ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 107 , Plaintiff's motions for summary judgment 84 and 98 are DENIED; Defendants' motion for summary judgment 94 is GRANTED; Judgment to issue; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, clb)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 39 ; Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 17 is denied; Defendants' Motion to Seal and for Sanctions 23 is granted; Exhibit A to Plaintiff's motion for partial summ ary judgment (Dkt 17-2) shall be stricken and removed from the docket; Plaintiff shall pay to Defendants, no later than 30 days from the date of this Order, $250.00; Plaintiff is put on notice that failure to timely pay this amount may result in dismissal of this action for failure to comply with the Court's orders; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
