Briggs #447282 v. Blake et al
| Kevin Devon Briggs #447282 |
| Ty Blake, Teri Helton, Unknown Smyth, Unknown Party, Unknown Plichta, Unknown Wilks, Unknown Kennedy and Unknown Parties |
| 1:2013cv01280 |
| November 25, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Southern Division (1) Office |
| Muskegon |
| Paul L. Maloney |
| Joseph G. Scoville |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
97
JUDGMENT in favor of defendants and against plaintiff; signed by District Judge Paul L. Maloney (Judge Paul L. Maloney, acr)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 83 ; denying motion for temporary restraining order 73 ; dismissing plaintiff's substantive due process claims for failure to state a claim; dismissing as moot plaintiff's claims for injunctive relief against defendants; signed by District Judge Paul L. Maloney (Judge Paul L. Maloney, acr)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 31 ; signed by District Judge Paul L. Maloney (Judge Paul L. Maloney, cmc)
|
|
Filing
10
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 8 Plaintiff's objection to the report and recommendation; REJECTING the report and recommendation 7 ; GRANTING 9 Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend the complaint; signed by Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney (Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney, kw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
