Rivera #239567 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
| Wilson Rivera #239567 |
| Michigan Department of Corrections, Daniel H. Heyns, Tom Finco, Chaplain's Advisory Council, Michael Martin, Robert Jones Bey, Leroy D. White, D. Stephens, Ray Wolfe and Unknown Part(y)(ies) |
| 1:2014cv00214 |
| March 5, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Southern Division (1) Office |
| Ionia |
| Robert J. Jonker |
| Hugh W. Brenneman |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
100
ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 93 ; Defendants White and Stephens's Motion for Summary Judgment 77 is granted; Plaintiff's claim against the Chaplain Advisory Council is dismissed for lack of prosecution; this action is terminated; the Court discerns no good-faith basis for an appeal; signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker (Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker, ymc)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 34 ; Defendants' motion for summary judgment 24 is granted; Defendants MDOC, Heyns, Finco, Martin and Wolfe are dismissed; Plaintiff may proceed on the claims outlined in this order ; signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker (Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker, ymc)
|
|
Filing
5
OPINION ; signed by Judge Robert J. Jonker (Judge Robert J. Jonker, ymc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
