Meyer #395742 v. Natole et al
Jonathan King Meyer #395742 |
Joseph Natole, Jeanne Nelson, Gregory Flentje, Janet Lance, Deborah Marcules and Jeff LaBrie |
1:2014cv00536 |
May 15, 2014 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Southern Division (1) Office |
Allegan |
Robert J. Jonker |
Hugh W. Brenneman |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 444 ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 440 , 387 ; signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker (Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker, sdb) |
Filing 349 ORDER ADOPTING IN PART AND REJECTING IN PART REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 311 ; granting Defendants Natole and Lance's motion for summary judgment 199 ; denying Plaintiff's motion for sanctions against Defendants Natole and Lance 299 ; AP PROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 326 ; granting Defendant Flentje's motion to dismiss 302 to the extent consistent with this Order and denied in all other respects; signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker (Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker, ymc) |
Filing 252 ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 228 ; Defendant Flentje's Motion to Set Aside Default 166 is GRANTED; Plaintiff's first and second Motions for Default Judgment 42 169 are DENIED ; signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker (Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker, ymc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.