Burley #502426 v. Rider et al
Edward Donald Burley #502426 |
Rhonda Rider, Scott Cline, Unknown Bradley and Joann Bridgeford |
1:2017cv00088 |
January 24, 2017 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Southern Division (1) Office |
Montcalm |
Robert J. Jonker |
Ray Kent |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 71 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the Eastern District of Michigan; signed by Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (Magistrate Judge Ray Kent, fhw) |
Filing 28 ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 24 ; Defendant's motion for summary judgment 16 is DENIED with respect to Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claim against Defendant Rider for providing inaccurate medical records and GRANTED in all other respects; Defendants Cline, Bradley, and Bridgeford are DISMISSED from this action; Plaintiff's Motion for Bench Trial 26 construed as part of his Objection in this case, is DENIED; this action will proceed only as to Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claim against Defendant Rider ; signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker (Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker, ymc) |
Filing 4 OPINION AND ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the Western District of Michigan. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DPer) [Transferred from Michigan Eastern on 1/24/2017.] |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.