Spearman #320836 v. Williams et al
| Rufus L. Spearman #320836 |
| Chad H. Williams, David Fenby and Peter Youngert |
| 1:2017cv01070 |
| December 7, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Southern Division (1) Office |
| Muskegon |
| Ellen S. Carmody |
| Janet T. Neff |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
140
OPINION; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (kml)
|
|
Filing
127
OPINION AND ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 118 ; Defendants' motion for summary judgment 106 is GRANTED; Judgment to issue; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, clb)
|
|
Filing
84
OPINION AND ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 78 ; Defendants' motion for summary judgment 53 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction 65 is DENIED; Plaintiff's motion for Court to take judicial notice 82 is DENIED as moot; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, clb)
|
|
Filing
34
OPINION AND ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 31 except as noted; Motion to dismiss 21 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; case is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, clb)
|
|
Filing
13
OPINION; Order to issue; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, clb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
