Medwest Associates, Inc. v. Wagner
| MEDWEST ASSOCIATES, INC. |
| ERIC WAGNER |
| 1:2018cv00966 |
| August 28, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Ellen S Carmody |
| Janet T Neff |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 21
ORDER requiring dismissal papers or a joint notice to be filed no later than 11/9/2018; adjourning without date certain deadlines and the 11/15/2018 motion hearing and scheduling conference; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw)
|
| Filing 20 NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT in Principle (Conyers, Raechel) |
|
Filing 19
ORDER setting Rule 16 scheduling conference: Rule 16 scheduling conference is set for 11/15/2018 at 02:30 PM at 401 Federal Building, Grand Rapids, MI before Judge Janet T. Neff; joint status report due by 11/8/2018; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw)
|
| Filing 18 NOTICE OF MOTION HEARING regarding document number #5 : Defendant's response to motion for preliminary injunction due by 10/23/2018; motion hearing is set for 11/15/2018 at 02:30 PM at 401 Federal Building, Grand Rapids, MI before Judge Janet T. Neff; (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw) |
| Filing 17 ANSWER to complaint #1 with affirmative defenses by Eric Wagner (Conyers, Raechel) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER granting #13 unopposed motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise respond; Defendant has up to and including 10/12/2018 to file his response to the Verified Complaint; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw)
|
| Filing 15 CERTIFICATE regarding compliance with LCivR 7.1(d) re UNOPPOSED MOTION for extension of time to file answer re #1 and Certificate of Service #13 , PROPOSED ORDER regarding Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Verified Complaint for Injunctive Relief by defendant Eric Wagner #14 and Certificate of Service filed by Eric Wagner (Conyers, Raechel) |
| Filing 14 PROPOSED ORDER regarding Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Verified Complaint for Injunctive Relief by defendant Eric Wagner (Conyers, Raechel) |
| Filing 13 UNOPPOSED MOTION for extension of time to file answer re #1 and Certificate of Service by defendant Eric Wagner; (Conyers, Raechel) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER regarding motion for extension of time to answer #10 and certificate of concurrence; the motion is denied without prejudice to refile; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw)
|
| Filing 11 PROPOSED ORDER regarding Granting Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Verified Complaint for Injunctive Relief by defendant Eric Wagner (Conyers, Raechel) |
| Filing 10 UNOPPOSED MOTION for extension of time to file answer re #1 and Certificate of Service by defendant Eric Wagner; (Conyers, Raechel) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS returned executed; Eric Wagner served on 9/14/2018, answer due 10/5/2018 (Lowe, Timothy) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendant Eric Wagner (ems) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER DENYING ex parte temporary restraining order #5 ; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, clb)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE re #5 Certification Pursuant to Rule 65(b)(1) by plaintiff Medwest Associates, Inc. (Lowe, Timothy) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of James J. Giszczak on behalf of plaintiff Medwest Associates, Inc. (Giszczak, James) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for temporary restraining order , MOTION for preliminary injunction by plaintiff Medwest Associates, Inc.; (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Employment Agreement, #2 Exhibit B - Proposed Order on Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction) (Lowe, Timothy) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Medwest Associates, Inc. (Lowe, Timothy) |
| Filing 3 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Lowe, Timothy) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Janet T. Neff ; with NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re filing fee, re corporate disclosure statement (ems) |
| SUMMONS NOT ISSUED as to defendant Eric Wagner (filing fee not paid and no summons provided) (ems) |
| FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff Medwest Associates, Inc. in the amount of $400, receipt number 0646-4220651 (Lowe, Timothy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Eric Wagner filed by Medwest Associates, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Employment Agreement) (Lowe, Timothy) Modified text on 8/29/2018 (jlg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Medwest Associates, Inc. v. Wagner | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ERIC WAGNER | |
| Represented By: | Raechel T.X. Conyers |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: MEDWEST ASSOCIATES, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Timothy James Lowe |
| Represented By: | James J. Giszczak |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
