Sparrow v. Boone et al
Daniel Sparrow |
Rob Sypien, Roosevelt Park, City of and Dave Boone |
1:2018cv01068 |
September 12, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Phillip J Green |
Paul L Maloney |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE to attorney Adam Walker regarding recent filing #5 (clw) |
Filing 5 Defendants' ANSWER to complaint #1 with affirmative defenses and jury demand by Dave Boone, Roosevelt Park, City of, Rob Sypien (Walker, Adam) |
(NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Adam John Walker on behalf of defendants Dave Boone, Roosevelt Park, City of, Rob Sypien (Walker, Adam) |
(NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Kevin Timothy Sutton on behalf of defendants Dave Boone, Roosevelt Park, City of, Rob Sypien (Sutton, Kevin) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendants Dave Boone, Roosevelt Park, City of, Rob Sypien (clw) |
Filing 3 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Klaus, Nicholas) |
Filing 2 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Paul L. Maloney (clw) |
SUMMONS NOT ISSUED as to defendants Dave Boone, Roosevelt Park, City of, Rob Sypien (none provided) (clw) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Dave Boone, Roosevelt Park, City of, Rob Sypien filed by Daniel Sparrow (Klaus, Nicholas) |
FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff Daniel Sparrow in the amount of $400, receipt number 0646-4233881 (Klaus, Nicholas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.