Jarquin Ventura v. Nielsen et al
| Eduardo Jarquin Ventura |
| United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Daniel Renaud, Kirstjen Nielsen, Department of Homeland Security and L. Francis Cissna |
| 1:2018cv01069 |
| September 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Ellen S Carmody |
| Janet T Neff |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL of case filed by plaintiff Eduardo Jarquin Ventura (Asch, Marc) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to L. Francis Cissna, Department of Homeland Security, Kirstjen Nielsen, Daniel Renaud, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General and delivered to US Marshal for service (mg) |
Filing 5
ORDER granting plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis; signed by Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody (Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody, jal)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Janet T. Neff (mg) |
| Filing 3 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Asch, Marc) |
| COMPLAINT RECEIVED; IFP Decision Pending (mg) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION TO PROCEED without prepayment of fees and affidavit (Asch, Marc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for mandamus relief against All Defendants filed by Eduardo Jarquin Ventura (Asch, Marc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
