Savoie et al v. East Lansing, City of et al
| Natalie Paige Louise Hooper and Tiffany Louise Savoie |
| matthew swab, Jeff Murphy, John Does 1-10, city of east lansing, adam park, Unknown Party #2, Unknown Parties, Unknown Party #1 and East Lansing, City of |
| 1:2018cv01180 |
| October 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Ellen S Carmody |
| Janet T Neff |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY ADMISSION LETTER sent to attorney Adam M. Kessler; attorney admission deadline set for 11/16/2018; (ns) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Janet T. Neff ; with NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re filing fee (ns) |
| SUMMONS NOT ISSUED as to defendants East Lansing, City of, Jeff Murphy, Adam Park, Matthew Swab ; filing fee is due; none provided (ns) |
| FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiffs Natalie Paige Louise Hooper, Tiffany Louise Savoie in the amount of $400, receipt number 0646-4268640 (Marker, Caleb) |
| Copy of Notice Regarding Assignment of Case #2 sent via U.S. Mail to Adam M. Kessler (ns) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against John Does 1-10, Jeff Murphy, City of East Lansing, Adam Park, Matthew Swab filed by Natalie Paige Louise Hooper, Tiffany Louise Savoie (Marker, Caleb) Modified text on 10/19/2018 (ns). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
