Peterson v. Commissioner of Social Security
| David M. Peterson |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| Social Security Administration |
| 1:2018cv01184 |
| October 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Ellen S Carmody |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security served on 10/30/2018, answer due 12/31/2018 (clw) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Nicole J. Sonia on behalf of defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Sonia, Nicole) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by David M. Peterson (Rinck, James) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General and delivered to US Marshal for service (clw) |
Filing 4
ORDER granting plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis; signed by Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody (Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody, jal)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody (jlg) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION TO PROCEED without prepayment of fees and affidavit (Rinck, James) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by David M. Peterson (Attachments: #1 Summons) (Rinck, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
