Gee v. Horton
Robert Earl Gee and Robert Earl Gee #452903 |
Warden Connie Horton and Connie Horton |
1:2018cv01375 |
December 11, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Ray Kent |
Paul L Maloney |
Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE by certified mail upon Attorney General January 22, 2019 (ns) |
SERVICE by CERTIFIED MAIL in a habeas action: copy of habeas petition and order to answer sent by certified mail, article number 7001 0360 0000 8677 5516 as to the Attorney General; Respondent Connie Horton served via regular mail (ns) |
Filing 3 ORDER TO FILE ANSWER OR OTHER PLEADING: the Clerk to serve a copy of the petition and brief by regular mail on the respondent and one copy by certified mail on the Attorney General of the State of MI; respondent to answer the habeas petition within 180 days; no extensions will be granted; signed by Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (Magistrate Judge Ray Kent, fhw) |
Filing 2 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Paul L. Maloney and Magistrate Judge Ray Kent ; with NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re filing fee (ns) |
FILING FEE PAID re #1 by petitioner Robert Earl Gee #452903 in the amount of $5, receipt number 0646-4314153 (Comorski, Phillip) |
Filing 1 PETITION for writ of habeas corpus filed by Robert Earl Gee (Comorski, Phillip) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.