Hamminga v. Nemeth et al
| Audrey Hamminga |
| The United States of America-Internal Revenue Service, Evelyn Nemeth, The State of Michigan and Ernest J. Nemeth |
| 1:2018cv01418 |
| December 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Ray Kent |
| Paul L Maloney |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1444 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 CERTIFICATE regarding compliance with LCivR 7.1(d) re UNOPPOSED MOTION for extension of time to respond to Complaint #17 filed by The United States of America-Internal Revenue Service (Shiparski, Michael) |
| Filing 17 UNOPPOSED MOTION for extension of time to respond to Complaint by defendant The United States of America-Internal Revenue Service; (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Shiparski, Michael) |
| Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE by plaintiff Audrey Hamminga re Default (Entry of) #15 (Popovits, Gary) |
| Filing 15 DEFAULT ENTERED as to defendants Ernest J. Nemeth, Evelyn Nemeth (clw) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE by plaintiff Audrey Hamminga for service of the Summons and Complaint on Defendant Evelyn Nemeth (Popovits, Gary) |
| Filing 13 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by plaintiff Audrey Hamminga re APPLICATION for entry of default as to Evelyn Nemeth #11 , APPLICATION for entry of default as to Ernest J. Nemeth #12 (Popovits, Gary) |
| Filing 12 APPLICATION for entry of default as to Ernest J. Nemeth (Popovits, Gary) |
| Filing 11 APPLICATION for entry of default as to Evelyn Nemeth (Popovits, Gary) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE by plaintiff Audrey Hamminga for service of the Summons and Complaint on Defendant Ernest J. Nemeth (Popovits, Gary) |
Filing 9
ORDER granting #4 motion for extension of time to answer; defendant for defendant United States of America to respond to complaint extended to 2/19/2019; signed by District Judge Paul L. Maloney (Judge Paul L. Maloney, acr)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Paul L. Maloney (clw) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by defendant The United States of America-Internal Revenue Service re MOTION for extension of time to file answer re #1 #4 , Memorandum in Support of a Motion #5 , Certificate Regarding Motion Concurrence #6 , Notice of Removal #1 (Shiparski, Michael) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE regarding compliance with LCivR 7.1(d) re MOTION for extension of time to file answer re #1 #4 filed by The United States of America-Internal Revenue Service (Shiparski, Michael) |
| Filing 5 MEMORANDUM in support of Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer #4 or Otherwise Plead filed by The United States of America-Internal Revenue Service (Shiparski, Michael) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for extension of time to file answer re #1 by defendant The United States of America-Internal Revenue Service; (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order for extension of time) (Shiparski, Michael) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by defendant The United States of America-Internal Revenue Service re Notice of Filing Notice of Removal #2 (Shiparski, Michael) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING notice of removal re #1 directed to Cass County Circuit Court by defendant The United States of America-Internal Revenue Service (Shiparski, Michael) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Cass County Circuit Court case number 18-000563-CH filed by The United States of America-Internal Revenue Service (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Complaint) (Shiparski, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
