Kulinski v. Yates Dial-A-Ride
Betty Kulinski |
Yates Dial-A-Ride |
1:2018cv01422 |
December 21, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Ellen S Carmody |
Janet T Neff |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Copy of Order Rescheduling Rule 16 Conference, #8 sent via U.S. Mail to Betty Kulinski (mg) |
Filing 8 ORDER rescheduling Rule 16 conference previously scheduled for 3/13/2019 at 10:00 AM: Rule 16 scheduling conference is set for 3/21/2019 at 11:00 AM at 650 Federal Building, Grand Rapids, MI before Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody; status report due by 3/18/2019; signed by Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody (Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody, jal) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS returned executed by US Marshal by mail with acknowledgment of receipt of summons and complaint by Candace Fisher for Yates Dial-A-Ride served on 2/4/2019, answer due 2/25/2019 (mg) |
Copy of Order Setting Rule 16 Scheduling Conference, #6 sent via U.S. Mail to Betty Kulinski (mg) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING by defendant Yates Dial-A-Ride re Attorney Appearance, Attorney Appearance (Cascini, Andrew) |
Filing 6 ORDER setting Rule 16 scheduling conference: Rule 16 scheduling conference is set for 3/13/2019 at 10:00 AM at 650 Federal Building, Grand Rapids, MI before Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody; status report due by 3/8/2019; signed by Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody (Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody, jal) |
(NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Anthony R. Comden on behalf of defendant Yates Dial-A-Ride (Comden, Anthony) |
(NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Andrew Anthony Cascini on behalf of defendant Yates Dial-A-Ride (Cascini, Andrew) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Yates Dial-A-Ride and delivered to US Marshal for service (jlb) |
Copy of Orders #4 and #5 sent via U.S. Mail to Betty Kulinski (pjw) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis; signed by Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody (Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody, jal) |
Filing 4 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of receipt of case (clw) |
Copy of Receipt of Case Notice #3 sent via U.S. Mail to Betty Kulinski (clw) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION TO PROCEED without prepayment of fees and affidavit (clw) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Yates Dial-A-Ride filed by Betty Kulinski (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1, #2 Attachment 2) (clw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Kulinski v. Yates Dial-A-Ride | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Betty Kulinski | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Yates Dial-A-Ride | |
Represented By: | Anthony R. Comden |
Represented By: | Andrew Anthony Cascini |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.