Chrzan #799498 v. Mackay et al
Tyler Chrzan #799498 |
T. Mackay and E. Hoffman |
1:2019cv00116 |
February 11, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Ellen S Carmody |
Janet T Neff |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
RECEIPT (Prisoner Litigation): filing fee installment in the amount of $17.72, receipt number KZ003812; amount paid to date $23.68 (jlb) |
RECEIPT (Prisoner Litigation): filing fee installment in the amount of $5.96, receipt number KZ003010; amount paid to date $5.96 (jlb) |
Filing 4 ORDER TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS and FOR PAYMENT OF FILING FEE: plaintiff to pay an initial partial fee of $5.96 when funds are available; plaintiff to make interim payments until the full fee is paid; signed by Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody (Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody, jal) |
Copy of Order to Proceed IFP - Initial Fee Due When Funds Are Available - Prisoner, #4 sent via U.S. Mail to Tyler Chrzan #799498 (ems) |
Filing 3 PROOF OF SERVICE by plaintiff Tyler Chrzan #799498 re Financial Affidavit #2 , Complaint with Magistrate Referral #1 (ems) |
Filing 2 FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT by plaintiff Tyler Chrzan #799498 (Attachments: #1 Financial Documents) (ems) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with magistrate referral and jury demand against E. Hoffman, T. Mackay filed by Tyler Chrzan #799498 (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibits A-E) (ems) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.