May-Shaw #11506-040 v. Grand Rapids, City of et al
Plaintiff: Christopher Payton May-Shaw #11506-040
Defendant: Jonathan Wu, Peter Thompson, Grand Rapids Police Department, Michael Mesman, Unknown Part(y)(ies) and Grand Rapids, City of
Case Number: 1:2019cv00117
Filed: February 13, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Phillip J Green
Referring Judge: Robert J Jonker
2 Judge: Ray Kent
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 27, 2019 Copy of Order to Proceed IFP - Initial Fee Due in 28 Days - Prisoner #9 sent via U.S. Mail to Federal Bureau of Prisons at Milan (FCI) Federal Correctional Institution P.O. Box 1000 Milan, MI 48160 (pjw)
March 27, 2019 Copy of Order to Proceed IFP - Initial Fee Due in 28 Days - Prisoner #9 sent via U.S. Mail to Christopher Payton May-Shaw #11506-040 (pjw)
March 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS and FOR PAYMENT OF FILING FEE: plaintiff to pay an initial partial fee of $93.25 within 28 days; plaintiff to make interim payments until the full fee is paid; (initial partial filing fee to be submitted by 4/23/2019); signed by Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (Magistrate Judge Ray Kent, fhw)
March 13, 2019 Filing 8 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT statement by plaintiff Christopher Payton May-Shaw #11506-040 (Attachments: #1 Financial Documents, #2 cover letter) (pjw)
February 28, 2019 Filing 7 LETTER from Christopher Payton May-Shaw #11506-040 requesting appellate forms and a copy of his complaint (Attachments: #1 Response from Clerk) (pjw)
February 28, 2019 Filing 6 LETTER from Christopher Payton May-Shaw #11506-040 requesting a copy of his complaint; he indicated he sent in a self-addressed stamped envelope with his original complaint; courtesy copy of complaint sent to plaintiff (pjw)
February 20, 2019 Copy of Deficiency Order, #5 sent via U.S. Mail to Christopher Payton May-Shaw #11506-040 (ns)
February 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 DEFICIENCY ORDER: plaintiff has failed to pay the filing fee or file the required documents to apply to proceed in forma pauperis; deficiency to be cured by 3/19/2019 or the action will be dismissed; signed by Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (Magistrate Judge Ray Kent, fhw)
February 19, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE that this case is reassigned to Magistrate Judge Ray Kent for all further proceedings pursuant to Administrative Order Number 14-064 ; Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Green no longer assigned to case (clw)
February 13, 2019 Filing 3 LETTER from plaintiff Christopher Payton May-Shaw #11506-040 regarding being unable to get a copy of the originals due to his location, requesting the court mail back time stamped copies; deputy clerk made a copy of page 1 of each document, showing file stamp, and mailed back to plaintiff (pjw) Modified file date on 2/15/2019 (pjw).
February 13, 2019 Filing 2 APPLICATION TO PROCEED without prepayment of fees and affidavit (pjw)
February 13, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with magistrate referral against All Defendants filed by Christopher Payton May-Shaw #11506-040 (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1-certificate of service) (pjw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: May-Shaw #11506-040 v. Grand Rapids, City of et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jonathan Wu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Peter Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Grand Rapids Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Mesman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Part(y)(ies)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Grand Rapids, City of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Payton May-Shaw #11506-040
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?