Walker v. Berrien, County of et al
Personal Rep Ladonna Walker, Deceased Martell Hadley and Ladonna Walker |
#5 John Doe, Lieutenant Jeff Duffield, Lieutenant Edward Kuhl, Berrien, County of, #4 John Doe, #1 John Doe, Undersheriff Chuck Heit, #2 John Doe, #3 John Doe, Captain Brian Wilkey, Officer Kimberly, Sheriff Leonard Bailey, Leonard Bailey, Unknown Parties, Jeff Duffield, Chuck Heit, Brian Wilkey, Edward Kuhl and Unknown Kimberly |
1:2019cv00151 |
February 27, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Ellen S Carmody |
Janet T Neff |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL of case filed by plaintiff Ladonna Walker (Sukup, Joseph) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendants Leonard Bailey, Berrien, County of, Jeff Duffield, Chuck Heit, Edward Kuhl, Brian Wilkey (ems) |
Filing 3 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Janet T. Neff (ems) |
SUMMONS NOT ISSUED as to defendants Unknown Kimberly, Unknown Parties (none provided) (ems) |
Filing 2 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Sukup, Joseph) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants filed by Ladonna Walker (Sukup, Joseph) Modified text on 2/28/2019 (ems). |
FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiffs Ladonna Walker in the amount of $400, receipt number 0646-4373484 (Sukup, Joseph) Modified text on 2/28/2019 (ems). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.