Smith v. Kellogg Community College
Carrie Smith |
Kellogg Community College |
1:2019cv00152 |
February 27, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Robert J Jonker |
Ray Kent |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER granting STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL #9 ; the case is closed ; signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker (Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker, ymc) |
Filing 9 PROPOSED ORDER regarding Dismissal by defendant Kellogg Community College (Koss, Ryan) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to complaint #1 with affirmative defenses by Kellogg Community College (Koss, Ryan) |
(NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Joseph Abraham Starr on behalf of defendant Kellogg Community College (Starr, Joseph) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting PROPOSED ORDER #6 extending time to answer ; signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker (Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker, ymc) |
Filing 6 PROPOSED ORDER regarding Extending Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint by defendant Kellogg Community College (Koss, Ryan) |
Filing 5 ORDER setting Rule 16 scheduling conference: Rule 16 scheduling conference is set for 4/23/2019 at 04:00 PM at 699 Federal Building, Grand Rapids, MI before Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker; status report due by 4/16/2019 ; signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker (Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker, ymc) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Carrie Smith (Kreter, Mark) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Kellogg Community College (Koss, Ryan) |
Filing 2 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Robert J. Jonker ; with NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re corporate disclosure statement (mg) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Calhoun County Circuit Court case number 19-391-CZ filed by Kellogg Community College (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 -State Court Documents - Summons, Complaint, Motion for ex parte temporary restraining order, show cause, preliminary injunction, and for expedited discovery, Brief in support of tro, Exhibits to Complaint (Exhibit A- Medical information, Exhibit B- Affidavit Dr. Helgerson, Exhibit C-Letter to students, Exhibit D-Policies, Exhibit E-FOIA request, Exhibit F- Letter from KCC, Exhibit G- Progress report, Exhibit H- Peters v. Univ of Cinc, Exhibit I- proposed TRO ) (Koss, Ryan) Modified text on 2/28/2019 (mg). |
FILING FEE PAID re #1 by defendant Kellogg Community College in the amount of $400, receipt number 0646-4373565 (Koss, Ryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Smith v. Kellogg Community College | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Carrie Smith | |
Represented By: | Mark E. Kreter |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Kellogg Community College | |
Represented By: | Ryan J. Koss |
Represented By: | Joseph Abraham Starr |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.