Trancik v. The Trinitarians of Mary
| Jerry Trancik |
| The Trinitarians of Mary |
| 1:2019cv00167 |
| March 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Ray Kent |
| Paul L Maloney |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE rescheduling hearing (change in time only): telephone Rule 16 scheduling conference set for 5/9/2019 at 03:00 PM before District Judge Paul L. Maloney; all other provisions of the prior order remain in effect (Judge Paul L. Maloney, acr) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of LaRissa Dione Hollingsworth on behalf of plaintiff Jerry Trancik (Hollingsworth, LaRissa) |
| Filing 9 BRIEF in support of MOTION to dismiss for failure to state a claim #8 filed by The Trinitarians of Mary (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O, #16 Exhibit P, #17 Exhibit Q, #18 Exhibit R, #19 Exhibit S) (McElwee, Michael) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to dismiss for failure to state a claim by defendant The Trinitarians of Mary; (McElwee, Michael) |
Filing 7
ORDER setting Rule 16 scheduling conference by telephone: telephone Rule 16 scheduling conference set for 5/9/2019 at 04:30 PM before District Judge Paul L. Maloney; status report due by 5/6/2019; signed by District Judge Paul L. Maloney (Judge Paul L. Maloney, acr)
|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to complaint #1 with affirmative defenses and jury demand by The Trinitarians of Mary (McElwee, Michael) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Michael S. McElwee on behalf of defendant The Trinitarians of Mary (McElwee, Michael) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS returned executed; The Trinitarians of Mary served on 3/11/2019, answer due 4/1/2019 (Anding, John) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendant The Trinitarians of Mary (pjw) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Paul L. Maloney (pjw) |
| Filing 2 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Anding, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against The Trinitarians of Mary filed by Jerry Trancik (Anding, John) Modified text on 3/5/2019 (jlg) |
| FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff Jerry Trancik in the amount of $400, receipt number 0646-4377509 (Anding, John) Modified text on 3/5/2019 (jlg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Trancik v. The Trinitarians of Mary | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Trinitarians of Mary | |
| Represented By: | Michael S. McElwee |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jerry Trancik | |
| Represented By: | John E. Anding |
| Represented By: | LaRissa Dione Hollingsworth |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
