Smith v. Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc.

Plaintiff: Mathew L. Smith
Defendant: Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2019cv00214
Filed: March 20, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 20, 2019 FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff Mathew L Smith in the amount of $400, receipt number 0646-4392467 (Cotner, Roger)
March 20, 2019 Filing 2 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Cotner, Roger)
March 20, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc. filed by Mathew L Smith (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Cotner, Roger)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mathew L. Smith
Represented By: Roger G. Cotner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?