Best v. Cadillac Accounts Receivable Management, Inc. et al
| Lonitta Best |
| John Does 1-25, Cadillac Accounts Receivable Management, Inc. and Unknown Parties |
| 1:2019cv00273 |
| April 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Ellen S Carmody |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: discovery to be completed by 11/29/2019; dispositive motions due by 1/15/2020; early settlement conference set for 10/16/2019 at 01:00 PM at 601 Federal Building, Grand Rapids, MI before Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Green; final pretrial conference set for 8/12/2020 at 10:00 AM at 650 Federal Building, Grand Rapids, MI before Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody; jury trial set for 9/9/2020 at 09:00 AM at 650 Federal Building, Grand Rapids, MI before Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody; signed by Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody (Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody, jal)
|
| Filing 12 MINUTES of scheduling conference by telephone held before Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody; case management order to issue (Proceedings Not Recorded) (Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody, jal) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE rescheduling hearing that was previously set for 5/21/2019 at 10:00 AM before Judge Janet T. Neff: Rule 16 scheduling conference is set for 5/22/2019 at 10:00 AM at 664 Federal Building, Grand Rapids, MI before Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody (Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody, jal) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER OF REFERENCE pursuant to consent of parties to dispositive jurisdiction by a US Magistrate Judge; case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw)
|
| Filing 9 JOINT STATUS REPORT (Taub, Adam) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Daniel J. Ammon on behalf of defendant Cadillac Accounts Receivable Management, Inc. (Ammon, Daniel) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Yaakov Saks on behalf of plaintiff Lonitta Best (Saks, Yaakov) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER setting Rule 16 scheduling conference: Rule 16 scheduling conference is set for 5/21/2019 at 10:00 AM at 401 Federal Building, Grand Rapids, MI before Judge Janet T. Neff; joint status report due by 5/14/2019; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw)
|
| Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Cadillac Accounts Receivable Management, Inc. (Neidle, Gregory) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to complaint #1 with affirmative defenses and jury demand by Cadillac Accounts Receivable Management, Inc., Unknown Parties (Neidle, Gregory) |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Cadillac Accounts Receivable Management, Inc. (Neidle, Gregory) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendant Cadillac Accounts Receivable Management, Inc. (pjw) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Gregory R. Neidle on behalf of defendants Cadillac Accounts Receivable Management, Inc., Unknown Parties (Neidle, Gregory) |
| Filing 3 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Taub, Adam) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Janet T. Neff (pjw) |
| SUMMONS NOT ISSUED as to defendants Cadillac Accounts Receivable Management, Inc., Unknown Parties (none provided) (pjw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants filed by Lonitta Best (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Taub, Adam) |
| FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff Lonitta Best in the amount of $400, receipt number 0646-4408442 (Taub, Adam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
