Bland #893926 v. Drew et al
Plaintiff: Johnathan Lee Bland #893926
Defendant: Drew Wagner and Danny Pooley
Case Number: 1:2019cv00297
Filed: April 18, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Ellen S Carmody
Referring Judge: Janet T Neff
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 20, 2019 Copy of Order to Proceed IFP - Initial Fee Due When Funds Are Available - Prisoner #7 sent via U.S. Mail to Johnathan Lee Bland #893926 (pjw)
June 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS and FOR PAYMENT OF FILING FEE: plaintiff to pay an initial partial fee of $0.14 when funds are available; plaintiff to make interim payments until the full fee is paid; signed by Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody (Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody, jal)
June 17, 2019 Filing 6 PRISONER FINANCIAL DOCUMENT(S) (cure deficiency): application to proceed in forma pauperis and trust account statement submitted by plaintiff Johnathan Lee Bland #893926 to cure deficiency (Attachments: #1 Financial Documents) (pjw)
June 3, 2019 Copy of Deficiency Order #5 sent via U.S. Mail to Johnathan Lee Bland #893926 (jlg)
May 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 DEFICIENCY ORDER: plaintiff has failed to pay the filing fee or file the required documents to apply to proceed in forma pauperis; deficiency to be cured by 6/28/2019 or the action will be dismissed; signed by Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody (Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody, jal)
May 24, 2019 Filing 4 LETTER from plaintiff Johnathan Lee Bland #893926 requesting docket sheet; and 42:1983 forms; docket sheet and forms mailed to plaintiff on Mary 28, 2019 (jlg)
April 29, 2019 Filing 3 SIGNATURE PAGE submitted by plaintiff Johnathan Lee Bland #893926 for Complaint with Magistrate Referral #1 (pjw)
April 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CONDITIONAL ORDER striking Complaint with Magistrate Referral #1 unless the filing party submits a signature page within 21 days; signed by Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody (Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody, jal)
April 22, 2019 Copy of Conditional Order Striking Pleading or Other Paper #2 sent via U.S. Mail to Johnathan Lee Bland #893926 (pjw)
April 18, 2019 Filing 1 UNSIGNED COMPLAINT with magistrate referral against All Defendants filed by Johnathan Lee Bland #893926 (pjw); Modified text on 4/22/2019 (pjw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bland #893926 v. Drew et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Johnathan Lee Bland #893926
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Drew Wagner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Danny Pooley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?