Marvin v. Fluegeman et al
| Steven L. Marvin |
| Ray Fluegeman, Janet Cable and Lynn Owens |
| 1:2019cv00382 |
| May 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Ray Kent |
| Paul L Maloney |
| Taxes |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS returned executed by US Marshal by mail with acknowledgment of receipt of summons and complaint by Samuel Wells for Ray Fluegeman served on 6/28/2019, answer due 8/27/2019 (mg) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Janet Cable, Ray Fluegeman, Lynn Owens, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General and delivered to US Marshal for service (mg) |
| Copy of Order to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #5 sent via U.S. Mail to Steven L. Marvin (mg) |
Filing 5
ORDER granting plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis; signed by Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (Magistrate Judge Ray Kent, fhw)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of receipt of case (mg) |
| Copy of Receipt of Case Notice #4 sent via U.S. Mail to Steven L. Martin (mg) |
| Filing 3 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (mg) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION TO PROCEED without prepayment of fees and affidavit (mg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Janet Cable, Ray Fluegeman, Lynn Owens filed by Steven L. Marvin (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1, #2 Exhibit, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (mg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
