Stout v. Newaygo, County of et al
| Bernard Stout |
| Newaygo, County of, Justin Visser and John Borgman |
| 1:2019cv00400 |
| May 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Ellen S Carmody |
| Janet T Neff |
| P.I.: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: absent an answer or other responsive pleading, Plaintiff shall, not later than 7/29/2019, move for an entry of default or show cause in writing; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw)
|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS returned executed; John Borgman served on 5/29/2019, answer due 6/19/2019 (Dworetsky, David) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS returned executed; Justin Visser served on 5/31/2019, answer due 6/21/2019 (Dworetsky, David) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS returned executed; Newaygo, County of served on 6/5/2019, answer due 6/26/2019 (Dworetsky, David) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendants John Borgman, Newaygo, County of, Justin Visser (ns) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Janet T. Neff (ns) |
| Filing 2 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Dworetsky, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants filed by Bernard Stout (Dworetsky, David) |
| FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff Bernard Stout in the amount of $400, receipt number 0646-4441826 (Dworetsky, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
