Maggit #496871 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
| Demetrius Maggit #496871 |
| St. Louis Correctional Facility, Michigan Department of Corrections, Unknown Houghton and Michigan Parole Board |
| 1:2019cv00411 |
| May 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Ray Kent |
| Paul L Maloney |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Copy of Order Denying IFP (Able to Pay - Prisoner Civil Rights) #3 sent via U.S. Mail to Demetrius Maggit #496871 to Chicago address (ems) |
| CHANGE OF ADDRESS for plaintiff Demetrius Maggit #496871 to 848 W 103rd St., Apt. 211, Chicago, IL 60643 as taken from #1 and instructed per Order #3 (ems) |
Filing 3
ORDER DENYING IFP: plaintiff to pay the entire fee of $400.00 within 28 days or the case will be dismissed; filing fee to be submitted by 7/8/2019; signed by District Judge Paul L. Maloney (Judge Paul L. Maloney, acr)
|
| Filing 2 FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT by plaintiff Demetrius Maggit #496871 (ns) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with magistrate referral against Unknown Houghton, Michigan Department of Corrections, Michigan Parole Board, St. Louis Correctional Facility filed by Demetrius Maggit #496871 (ns) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
