Dehuelves et al v. Ingham County Prosecuting Attorney Office
Plaintiff: Irma I. Dehuelves and Moises M. Morejon
Defendant: Ingham County Prosecuting Attorney Office
Case Number: 1:2019cv00690
Filed: August 26, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Robert J Jonker
Referring Judge: Ray Kent
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 3, 2019 Certified Copy of Judgment #9 , Order Regarding Report and Recommendation, #8 sent via U.S. Mail to Irma I. Dehuelves and Moises M. Morejon (ns)
October 2, 2019 Filing 9 JUDGMENT in favor of Defendant ; signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker (Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker, ymc)
October 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION #7 ; Plaintiffs' complaint is dismissed; this matter is terminated; the Court discerns no good-faith basis for appeal ; signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker (Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker, ymc)
September 9, 2019 Copy of Report and Recommendation #7 sent via U.S. Mail to Irma I. Dehuelves and Moises M. Morejon (ns)
September 6, 2019 Filing 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 ; objections to R&R due within 14 days; signed by Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (jkw)
August 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting plaintiffs leave to proceed in forma pauperis; signed by Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (fhw)
August 29, 2019 Copy of Order to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #6 , Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge #5 sent via U.S. Mail to Irma I. Dehuelves and Moises M. Morejon (ns)
August 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Ray Kent ; signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker (Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker, ymc)
August 28, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE of receipt of case (ns)
August 28, 2019 Filing 3 APPLICATION TO PROCEED without prepayment of fees and affidavit by Irma I. Dehuelves (ns)
August 28, 2019 Copy of Receipt of Case Notice #4 sent via U.S. Mail to Irma I. Dehuelves and Moises M. Morejon (ns)
August 26, 2019 Filing 2 APPLICATION TO PROCEED without prepayment of fees and affidavit by Moises M. Morejon (ns)
August 26, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Ingham County Prosecuting Attorney Office filed by Irma I. Dehuelves, Moises M. Morejon (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1, #2 Summons) (ns)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dehuelves et al v. Ingham County Prosecuting Attorney Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ingham County Prosecuting Attorney Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Irma I. Dehuelves
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Moises M. Morejon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?