Michigan Electrical Employees' Pension Fund et al v. Riverway Electric Co., LLC et al
National Electrical Benefit Fund, Michigan Electrical Employees Health Plan, Michigan Electrical Employees' Pension Fund, West Michigan Labor-Management Cooperation Fund, West Michigan Electrical Joint Apprenticeship and Training Committee Trust and National Electrical Annuity Fund |
Riverway Electric Co., LLC and Fred Wohlfert |
1:2019cv00844 |
October 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Ray Kent |
Paul L Maloney |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by plaintiffs Michigan Electrical Employees Health Plan, Michigan Electrical Employees' Pension Fund, National Electrical Annuity Fund, National Electrical Benefit Fund, West Michigan Electrical Joint Apprenticeship and Training Committee Trust, West Michigan Labor-Management Cooperation Fund re Order on Proposed Order #7 Ex-Parte Order (i) Dismissing Case Without Prejudice, and (ii) Setting Procedures for Re-Opening of Case and Entry of Judgment (Calati, Hope) |
Filing 7 ORDER dismissing case without prejudice and setting procedures of re-opening case and entry of judgment; entered PROPOSED ORDER #3 ; signed by District Judge Paul L. Maloney (Judge Paul L. Maloney, acr) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendants Riverway Electric Co., LLC, Fred Wohlfert (ns) |
Filing 5 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Paul L. Maloney (ns) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by plaintiffs Michigan Electrical Employees Health Plan, Michigan Electrical Employees' Pension Fund, National Electrical Annuity Fund, National Electrical Benefit Fund, West Michigan Electrical Joint Apprenticeship and Training Committee Trust, West Michigan Labor-Management Cooperation Fund re PROPOSED ORDER regarding (i) Dismissing Case Without Prejudice, and (ii) Setting Procedures for Re-Opening of Case and Entry of Judgment by plaintiffs Michigan Electrical Employees Health Plan, Michigan Electrical Employees' Pension Fund, #3 (Calati, Hope) |
Filing 3 PROPOSED ORDER regarding (i) Dismissing Case Without Prejudice, and (ii) Setting Procedures for Re-Opening of Case and Entry of Judgment by plaintiffs Michigan Electrical Employees Health Plan, Michigan Electrical Employees' Pension Fund, National Electrical Annuity Fund, National Electrical Benefit Fund, West Michigan Electrical Joint Apprenticeship and Training Committee Trust, West Michigan Labor-Management Cooperation Fund (Calati, Hope) |
Filing 2 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Calati, Hope) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Fred Wohlfert, Riverway Electric Co., LLC filed by West Michigan Labor-Management Cooperation Fund, National Electrical Annuity Fund, Michigan Electrical Employees' Pension Fund, National Electrical Benefit Fund, Michigan Electrical Employees Health Plan, West Michigan Electrical Joint Apprenticeship and Training Committee Trust (Calati, Hope) |
FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiffs Michigan Electrical Employees Health Plan, Michigan Electrical Employees' Pension Fund, National Electrical Annuity Fund, National Electrical Benefit Fund, West Michigan Electrical Joint Apprenticeship and Training Committee Trust, West Michigan Labor-Management Cooperation Fund in the amount of $400, receipt number AMIWDC-4566082 (Calati, Hope) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.