Epstein v. Knorr Marketing, Inc.
John Epstein, d/b/a Direct Results and John Epstein |
Knorr Marketing, Inc. |
1:2019cv00912 |
October 29, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Phillip J Green |
Paul L Maloney |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 RESPONSE in support of MOTION to dismiss for failure to state a claim #10 filed by Knorr Marketing, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 3 - Discovery Responses, #2 Exhibit 4 - Comparison Chart) (Underwood, Steven) |
Filing 15 CERTIFICATE of compliance re word count for Response in Opposition #13 to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss filed by John Epstein (Dornbos, Jeffrey) |
Filing 14 DECLARATION re #13 Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) by plaintiff John Epstein (Dornbos, Jeffrey) |
Filing 13 RESPONSE in opposition to MOTION to dismiss for failure to state a claim #10 filed by John Epstein (Attachments: #1 Exhibit N) (Dornbos, Jeffrey) |
Filing 12 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Knorr Marketing, Inc. (Underwood, Steven) |
Filing 11 BRIEF in support of MOTION to dismiss for failure to state a claim #10 filed by Knorr Marketing, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Ex D Summary, #2 Exhibit 2 - Ex D/E Comparison) (Underwood, Steven) |
Filing 10 MOTION to dismiss for failure to state a claim by defendant Knorr Marketing, Inc.; (Underwood, Steven) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS returned executed; Knorr Marketing, Inc. served on 11/12/2019, answer due 12/3/2019 (Dornbos, Jeffrey) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendant Knorr Marketing, Inc. (mg) |
Filing 7 REPORT from the Clerk, WDMI, to the Register of Copyrights on the filing of a COPYRIGHT ACTION (mg) |
Filing 6 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Paul L. Maloney (mg) |
Copy of Report on the Filing of an Action or Appeal Regarding a Copyright #7 (with complaint) sent via U.S. Mail to Register of Copyrights (mg) |
Filing 5 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Dornbos, Jeffrey) |
Filing 4 EXHIBIT re #1 E - Part 3 by plaintiff John Epstein (Dornbos, Jeffrey) Modified text on 10/30/2019 (jlg) |
Filing 3 EXHIBIT re #1 E - Part 2 by plaintiff John Epstein (Dornbos, Jeffrey) Modified text on 10/30/2019 (jlg) |
Filing 2 EXHIBIT re #1 E - Part 1 by plaintiff John Epstein (Dornbos, Jeffrey) Modified text on 10/30/2019 (jlg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Knorr Marketing, Inc. filed by John Epstein (Attachments: #1 Exhibit AA, #2 Exhibit AB, #3 Exhibit AC, #4 Exhibit AD, #5 Exhibit BA, #6 Exhibit BB, #7 Exhibit BC, #8 Exhibit BD, #9 Exhibit BE, #10 Exhibit BF, #11 Exhibit BG, #12 Exhibit BH, #13 Exhibit BI, #14 Exhibit BJ, #15 Exhibit BK, #16 Exhibit BL, #17 Exhibit BM, #18 Exhibit BN, #19 Exhibit BO, #20 Exhibit BP, #21 Exhibit BQ, #22 Exhibit BR, #23 Exhibit BS, #24 Exhibit BT, #25 Exhibit BU, #26 Exhibit BV, #27 Exhibit BW, #28 Exhibit BX, #29 Exhibit BY, #30 Exhibit BZ, #31 Exhibit CA, #32 Exhibit CB, #33 Exhibit CC, #34 Exhibit CD, #35 Exhibit CE, #36 Exhibit CF, #37 Exhibit CG, #38 Exhibit CH, #39 Exhibit CI, #40 Exhibit CJ, #41 Exhibit CK, #42 Exhibit CL, #43 Exhibit CM, #44 Exhibit CN, #45 Exhibit CO, #46 Exhibit CP, #47 Exhibit CQ, #48 Exhibit CR, #49 Exhibit CS, #50 Exhibit D) (Dornbos, Jeffrey) Modified text on 10/30/2019 (jlg) |
FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff John Epstein in the amount of $400, receipt number AMIWDC-4579342 (Dornbos, Jeffrey) Modified text on 10/30/2019 (jlg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.