Carter v. Ludington, City of et al
| Ronnie E. Carter |
| Environmental Protection Agency, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, H&M Demolition and Ludington, City of |
| 1:2019cv01011 |
| November 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Phillip J Green |
| Janet T Neff |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Green; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw)
|
| Copy of Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge #3 sent via U.S. Mail to Ronnie E. Carter (ems) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of receipt of case (ems) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendants Environmental Protection Agency, Office of the Attorney General, United States Attorney, H&M Demolition, Ludington, City of, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality and returned to Plaintiff via mail (ems) Modified text on 12/2/2019 (ems). |
| Copy of Receipt of Case Notice #2 sent via U.S. Mail to Ronnie E. Carter (ems) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Environmental Protection Agency, H&M Demolition, Ludington, City of, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality filed by Ronnie E. Carter (ems) |
| RECEIPT: in the amount of $400.00, receipt number KZ004005; for civil filing fee (ems) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
