Twa v. Mercy Health Partners
Plaintiff: Kathryn Twa
Defendant: Mercy Health Partners
Case Number: 1:2019cv01049
Filed: December 13, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Phillip J Green
Referring Judge: Paul L Maloney
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER setting Rule 16 scheduling conference by telephone: telephone Rule 16 scheduling conference set for 2/24/2020 at 03:30 PM before District Judge Paul L. Maloney; status report due by 2/19/2020; signed by District Judge Paul L. Maloney (Judge Paul L. Maloney, acr)
January 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Mercy Health Partners identifying Corporate Parent Trinity Health-Michigan, Corporate Parent Trinity Health Corporation for Mercy Health Partners (Cessante, David)
January 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ANSWER to complaint #1 with affirmative defenses by Mercy Health Partners (Cessante, David)
January 6, 2020 Opinion or Order (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Nicole Michelle Paterson on behalf of defendant Mercy Health Partners (Paterson, Nicole)
January 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 STIPULATION AND ORDER; deadline for defendant to file answer to complaint extended to 1/23/2020; signed by District Judge Paul L. Maloney (Judge Paul L. Maloney, acr)
January 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 PROPOSED ORDER regarding Extension of time to file Answer to Complaint by defendant Mercy Health Partners (Cessante, David)
January 2, 2020 Opinion or Order (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of David M. Cessante on behalf of defendant Mercy Health Partners (Cessante, David)
December 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SUMMONS returned executed; Mercy Health Partners served on 12/19/2019, answer due 1/9/2020 (Batey, Scott)
December 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendant Mercy Health Partners (mg)
December 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Batey, Scott)
December 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Paul L. Maloney (mg)
December 16, 2019 Opinion or Order SUMMONS NOT ISSUED as to defendant Mercy Health Partners (none provided) (mg)
December 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Mercy Health Partners filed by Kathryn Twa (Batey, Scott)
December 13, 2019 Opinion or Order FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff Kathryn Twa in the amount of $400, receipt number AMIWDC-4698886 (Batey, Scott)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Twa v. Mercy Health Partners
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kathryn Twa
Represented By: Scott Preston Batey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mercy Health Partners
Represented By: Nicole Michelle Paterson
Represented By: David M. Cessante
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?