Binoir v. Department of Homeland Security
| Werner Sybrand Binoir |
| Department of Homeland Security |
| 1:2019cv01052 |
| December 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Phillip J Green |
| Robert J Jonker |
| Naturalization Application |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1447 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER granting [] motion to dismiss; signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker (Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker, sdb)
|
| MOTION to dismiss with prejudice (as taken from #8 ) by defendant Department of Homeland Security; (mg) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Naturalization Approval and Request for Dismissal with Prejudice by defendant Department of Homeland Security (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Cobb, Ryan) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting STIPULATION #6 ; signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker (Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker, sdb)
|
| Filing 6 PROPOSED STIPULATION and ORDER to Remand Plaintiff's Naturalization Petition and Administratively Stay Case by defendant Department of Homeland Security (Cobb, Ryan) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Ryan D. Cobb on behalf of defendant Department of Homeland Security (Cobb, Ryan) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS returned executed on All Defendants, US Attorney and US Attorney General; service on US Attorney's Office 12/23/2019, answer due 2/21/2020. (Rathi, Roger) Modified text on 1/10/2020 (mg). |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendant Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (mg) |
| Filing 3 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Rathi, Roger) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Robert J. Jonker (mg) |
| SUMMONS NOT ISSUED as to defendant Department of Homeland Security (none provided; please refer to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(i) regarding service on the United States and Its Agencies, Corporations, Officers, or Employees) (mg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Review of Denial of Naturalization against Department of Homeland Security filed by Werner Sybrand Binoir (Attachments: #1 Index Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit USCIS Denial of N-400 Application, #3 Exhibit N-336 Application and Memo, #4 Exhibit USCIS Denial of N-336) (Rathi, Roger) |
| FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff Werner Sybrand Binoir in the amount of $400, receipt number AMIWDC-4699864 (Rathi, Roger) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Binoir v. Department of Homeland Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Werner Sybrand Binoir | |
| Represented By: | Roger R. Rathi |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Department of Homeland Security | |
| Represented By: | Ryan D. Cobb |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
