Bentley et al v. USM Acquisition, LLC et al
| Zachary Bentley and Troy Ladehoff |
| Premier Surfaces, Inc., Premier Surfaces Acquisition, LLC, Clio Holdings, LLC, USM Acquisition LLC, Custom Premier Surfaces, Inc., Top Master Acquisition, USM Acquisition, LLC, Premier Surfaces Inc. and Tyron of GA, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv00011 |
| January 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Ray Kent |
| Paul L Maloney |
| Labor: Other |
| 29 U.S.C. § 2101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| SUMMONS NOT ISSUED as to defendants Clio Holdings, LLC, Custom Premier Surfaces, Inc., Top Master Acquisition, Tyron of GA, Inc., USM Acquisition, LLC (none provided) (ems) |
| Filing 3 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Zachary Bentley, Troy Ladehoff (Philo, John) Modified text and filers on 1/13/2020 (ems). |
| Filing 2 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Paul L. Maloney (ems) |
| SUMMONS NOT ISSUED as to defendants Clio Holdings, LLC, Custom Premier Surfaces, Inc., Premier Surfaces Acquisition, LLC, Premier Surfaces Inc., USM Acquisition, LLC (none provided) (ems) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants filed by Zachary Bentley (Philo, John) |
| FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff Zachary Bentley in the amount of $400, receipt number AMIWDC-4771121 (Philo, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.