Rodriguez v. Social Security Administration
| Abel M. Rodriguez |
| Social Security Administration |
| 1:2020cv00052 |
| January 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Robert J Jonker |
| Ray Kent |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 Clerk's Letter to Clerk of Court, United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan: Transfer Letter (jlg) |
Filing 15
ORDER filed granting motion #10 to the extent that the petition and all filings #5 , #8 are transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1631. ISSUED AS MANDATE: January 17, 2020. (Per Curiam) (jlg)
|
| Filing 14 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Isaac B. Rosenberg on behalf of defendant Social Security Administration (jlg) |
| Filing 13 REPLY to response to motion #10 filed by Social Security Administration (jlg) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE regarding scheduling conflict by plaintiff Abel M. Rodriguez (jlg) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE TO MOTION to dismiss or, in the alternative, to transfer #10 filed by Abel M. Rodriguez (jlg) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to dismiss or, in the alternative, to transfer by defendant Social Security Administration; (Attachments: #1 Appendix) (jlg) |
| Filing 9 (NON-DOCUMENT) NOTICE 3 paper copies of the Informal Opening Brief with Appendix #7 received from Petitioner Abel M. Rodriguez (jlg) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for hearing (Oral Argument Request) by plaintiff Abel M. Rodriguez; (jlg) |
| Filing 7 BRIEF by plaintiff Abel M. Rodriguez (Informal Opening Brief with Appendix) (jlg) |
| Filing 6 STATEMENT OF CASE by plaintiff Abel M. Rodriguez (Statement Concerning Discrimination) (jlg) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis by plaintiff Abel M. Rodriguez; (jlg) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of appearance as pro se by plaintiff Abel M. Rodriguez (jlg) |
| Filing 3 LETTER from plaintiff Abel M. Rodriguez regarding status of case; Case Information Request (jlg) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Adam E. Lyons on behalf of defendant Social Security Administration (jlg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with attachments against Social Security Administration filed by Abel M. Rodriguez (Attachments: #1 Notice of Docketing) (jlg) |
| CASE TRANSFERRED IN from Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, their case number 20-1025; documents numbered 1 through 16 received (jlg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rodriguez v. Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Abel M. Rodriguez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Isaac B. Rosenberg |
| Represented By: | Adam E. Lyons |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
