Maggit #496871 v. Grand Rapids, City of et al
Demetrius Maggit #496871 |
Unknown Party #2, Grand Rapids, City of, Grand Rapids Police Department, Kent County Correctional Facility, Unknown Party #4, Unknown Party #1, David Gillem, Unknown Party #3 and Unknown Party |
1:2020cv00224 |
March 13, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Ray Kent |
Paul L Maloney |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 RETURNED MAIL: Copy of Order Denying IFP (Able to Pay - Prisoner Civil Rights) #3 that was sent via U.S. Mail to Demetrius Maggit returned to the Court marked inmate not here; no action taken; plaintiff's address unknown (clw) |
Copy of Order Denying IFP (Able to Pay - Prisoner Civil Rights) #3 sent via U.S. Mail to Demetrius Maggit #496871 (ns) |
Filing 3 ORDER DENYING IFP: plaintiff to pay the entire fee of $400.00 within 28 days or the case will be dismissed;(filing fee to be submitted by 4/28/2020); signed by District Judge Paul L. Maloney (Judge Paul L. Maloney, cmc) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION TO PROCEED without prepayment of fees and affidavit (clw) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with magistrate referral against David Gillem, Grand Rapids Police Department, Grand Rapids, City of, Kent County Correctional Facility, Unknown Party, Unknown Party #1, Unknown Party #2, Unknown Party #3, Unknown Party #4 filed by Demetrius Maggit #496871 (clw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.