Mercado v. South Haven Housing Commission
Juanita Mercado |
City of South Haven, South Haven Housing Commission and South Haven, City of |
1:2020cv00474 |
May 29, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Ray Kent |
Janet T Neff |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 2000 e |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 REQUEST for pre-motion conference by defendant South Haven Housing Commission (Zdarsky, Amanda) |
Filing 20 ORDER dismissing as moot pre-motion conference requests #7 , #10 ; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw) |
Filing 19 ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL granting STIPULATION #15 ; all remaining claims against Defendant City of South Haven, only, are dismissed without prejudice and without cost; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw) |
Filing 18 RESPONSE TO REQUEST for pre-motion conference by defendant South Haven Housing Commission #10 ; filed by Juanita Mercado filed by Juanita Mercado (Buckleitner, Anne) |
Filing 17 RESPONSE TO REQUEST for pre-motion conference by defendant South Haven, City of #7 ; filed by Juanita Mercado filed by Juanita Mercado (Buckleitner, Anne) |
Filing 16 Plaintiff's AMENDED COMPLAINT against South Haven Housing Commission filed by Juanita Mercado (Buckleitner, Anne) |
Filing 15 PROPOSED STIPULATION and ORDER Dismissing City of South Haven by plaintiff Juanita Mercado (Buckleitner, Anne) |
Filing 14 ORDER: Plaintiff's response(s) to pre-motion conference requests #7 , #10 due no later than 7/13/2020; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw) |
Filing 13 ORDER granting motions for extension of time #8 , #11 ; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw) |
Filing 12 BRIEF in support of MOTION for extension of time to File Responsive Pleadings #11 filed by South Haven Housing Commission (Zdarsky, Amanda) |
Filing 11 MOTION for extension of time to File Responsive Pleadings by defendant South Haven Housing Commission; (Zdarsky, Amanda) |
Filing 10 REQUEST for pre-motion conference by defendant South Haven Housing Commission (Zdarsky, Amanda) |
Filing 9 BRIEF in support of MOTION for extension of time to Respond #8 filed by South Haven, City of (Brege, Andrew) |
Filing 8 MOTION for extension of time to Respond by defendant South Haven, City of; (Brege, Andrew) |
Filing 7 REQUEST for pre-motion conference by defendant South Haven, City of (Brege, Andrew) Modified text on 6/29/2020 (clw). |
Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE on behalf of South Haven Housing Commission served on 6/16/2020, answer due 7/7/2020 (Buckleitner, Anne) |
Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE on behalf of South Haven, City of served on 6/16/2020, answer due 7/7/2020 (Buckleitner, Anne) |
(NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Craig R. Noland on behalf of defendant South Haven Housing Commission (Noland, Craig) |
(NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Amanda Marie Zdarsky on behalf of defendant South Haven Housing Commission (Zdarsky, Amanda) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendants South Haven Housing Commission, South Haven, City of (clw) |
Filing 3 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Janet T. Neff (clw) |
Filing 2 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Buckleitner, Anne) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants filed by Juanita Mercado (Buckleitner, Anne) |
FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff Juanita Mercado in the amount of $400, receipt number AMIWDC-5293649 (Buckleitner, Anne) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.