Garcia #12946-040 v. Unknown Party
| Marco A. Garcia #12946-040 |
| Warden and Unknown Party |
| 1:2020cv00476 |
| May 29, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Ray Kent |
| Paul L Maloney |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Certified Copies of Judgment #10 , Order #9 sent via U.S. Mail to Marco A. Garcia #12946-040 (ems) |
| Filing 10 JUDGMENT ; signed by District Judge Paul L. Maloney (Judge Paul L. Maloney, cmc) |
Filing 9
ORDER re #1 ; signed by District Judge Paul L. Maloney (Judge Paul L. Maloney, cmc)
|
|
Filing 8
DEFICIENCY ORDER: petitioner has failed to pay the filing fee or file the required documents to apply to proceed in forma pauperis; deficiency to be cured by 6/30/2020 or the action will be dismissed; signed by Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (fhw)
|
| Copy of Deficiency Order #8 sent via U.S. Mail to Marco A. Garcia #12946-040 (ems) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of receipt of case (ems) |
| Copy of Receipt of Case Notice #7 sent via U.S. Mail to Marco A. Garcia #12946-040 (jlb) |
| Filing 6 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from Connecticut, their case number 3:20-cv-00728; the documents listed above were electronically transferred to the Western District of Michigan (ndj) |
|
Filing 5
Order of transfer - Mr. Garcia is currently serving a term of imprisonment at FCI Danbury following his conviction in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan. United States v. Garcia, No. 1:94-cr-00190-PLM-6. Although docketed as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, the Court construes the letter received from Mr. Garcia as a motion for sentence reduction or compassionate release under the First Step Act, 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(1)(A). Further, the Court understands that the same motion has been submitted, albeit in a different form, in his criminal matter, which is currently assigned to Judge Paul L. Maloney in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan. Because Mr. Garcia's motion must be taken up by the court presiding over his criminal matter, the Clerk of the Court is directed to transfer this matter to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 5/28/2020.(Gould, K.)[Transferred from Connecticut on 5/29/2020.] Modified text on 5/29/2020 (ndj).
|
| Filing 4 Notice to petitioner re: Insufficiency. You must submit the $5.00 filing fee or the attached IFP aplication which is being sent to you via U.S. mail along with a ledger sheet showing the past six months transactions. If insufficiency not corrected Dismissal due by 6/18/2020 Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 5/28/20.(Payton, R.) [Transferred from Connecticut on 5/29/2020.] |
|
Filing 3
Standing protective order Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 05/26/2020.(Fazekas, J.) [Transferred from Connecticut on 5/29/2020.] Modified text on 5/29/2020 (ndj).
|
|
Filing 2
Electronic filing order for counsel - please ensure compliance with courtesy copy requirements in this order. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 05/26/2020.(Fazekas, J.) [Transferred from Connecticut on 5/29/2020.] Modified text on 5/29/2020 (ndj).
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Marco A. Garcia.(Fazekas, J.) [Transferred from Connecticut on 5/29/2020.] Modified text on 5/29/2020 (ndj). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
