White #690863 v. Rewerts
Defendant: Randee Rewerts
Petitioner: Valden Devone White #690863
Case Number: 1:2020cv00717
Filed: August 3, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Phillip J Green
Referring Judge: Hala Y Jarbou
2 Judge: Robert J Jonker
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE by certified mail upon Attorney General 09/25/2020 (ndj)
September 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE that this case is reassigned to District Judge Hala Y. Jarbou under #Administrative Order No. 20-CA-071 ; Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker is no longer assigned to the case (krv)
September 23, 2020 Opinion or Order SERVICE by CERTIFIED MAIL in a habeas action: copy of habeas petition and order to answer sent by certified mail, article number 7015 1520 0002 0362 5984 as to the Attorney General; Respondent Randee Rewerts served via regular mail (slk)
September 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Copy of Order to Answer (Habeas), #5 sent via U.S. Mail to Valden Devone White (slk)
September 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER TO FILE ANSWER OR OTHER PLEADING: the Clerk to serve a copy of the petition and brief by regular mail on the respondent and one copy by certified mail on the Attorney General of the State of MI; respondent to answer the habeas petition within 180 days; no extensions will be granted; signed by Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Green (jkw)
August 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 SIGNATURE PAGE submitted by petitioner Valden Devone White #690863 for Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus #1 (ndj)
August 17, 2020 Opinion or Order RECEIPT: filing fee in the amount of $ 5.00, receipt number GR071679 (jmw)
August 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Copy of Conditional Order Striking Pleading or Other Paper #3 , Deficiency Order #2 sent via U.S. Mail to Valden Devone White #690863 (clw)
August 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 CONDITIONAL ORDER striking Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus #1 unless the filing party submits a signature page within 21 days; signed by Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Green (jkw)
August 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 DEFICIENCY ORDER: petitioner has failed to pay the filing fee or file the required documents to apply to proceed in forma pauperis; deficiency to be cured by 9/2/2020 or the action will be dismissed filing fee to be submitted by 9/2/2020; signed by Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Green (jkw)
August 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 UNSIGNED PETITION for writ of habeas corpus filed by Valden Devone White #690863 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (ndj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: White #690863 v. Rewerts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Randee Rewerts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Valden Devone White #690863
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?