Soupal v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Mark C Soupal and Mark C. Soupal |
| Commissioner of SS and Commissioner of Social Security |
| Social Security Administration |
| 1:2020cv00863 |
| September 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Ray Kent |
| Social Security: SSID Title XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
NOTICE to attorney James Rinck regarding recent filing #4 (pjw)
|
|
SUMMONS returned executed on Commissioner of Social Security, US Attorney and US Attorney General; service upon defendant, Commissioner of Social Security complete on 9/23/2020, answer due 11/23/2020 (as taken from #4 ) (pjw) Modified text on 10/19/2020 (pjw).
|
|
Filing 4
PROOF OF SERVICE by plaintiff Mark C. Soupal re Summons Issued as to USA #3 (Rinck, James)
|
|
Filing 3
SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendant Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (jlg)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE that this case has been assigned Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (jlg)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Mark C. Soupal (Attachments: #1 Summons) (Rinck, James) Modified text on 9/9/2020 (jlg)
|
|
RECEIPT: in the amount of $400.00 by attorney James R. Rinck on behalf of plaintiff, receipt number AMIWDC-5653798; for filing fee (mkc)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
