Meave v. Eaton Corporation
Plaintiff: Lua Meave
Defendant: Eaton Corporation
Case Number: 1:2020cv00942
Filed: September 25, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Phillip J Green
Referring Judge: Robert J Jonker
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: discovery to be completed by 5/31/2021; dispositive motions due by 6/30/2021; settlement conference set for 10/13/2021 at 09:00 AM at 601 Federal Building, Grand Rapids, MI before Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Green; final pretrial conference set for 11/16/2021 at 03:00 PM at 699 Federal Building, Grand Rapids, MI before Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker; jury trial set for 11/30/2021 at 08:30 AM at 699 Federal Building, Grand Rapids, MI before Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker; signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker (Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker, ymc)
November 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER cancelling Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 11/12/2020; the Court will issue a Case Management Order by separate order (Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker, ymc)
November 5, 2020 Filing 7 JOINT STATUS REPORT (Wiseley, Aaron)
September 28, 2020 Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Eaton Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Eaton Corporation plc for Eaton Corporation (Ryan, Timothy)
September 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER setting Rule 16 scheduling conference: Rule 16 scheduling conference is set for 11/12/2020 at 10:00 AM at 699 Federal Building, Grand Rapids, MI before Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker; status report due by 11/5/2020 ; signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker (Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker, ymc)
September 28, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Robert J. Jonker ; with NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re filing fee re corporate disclosure statement (mg)
September 28, 2020 Filing 3 (DISREGARD) NOTICE that this case has been assigned Robert J. Jonker ; with NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re filing fee (mg) Modified text on 9/28/2020 (mg).
September 28, 2020 FILING FEE PAID re #1 by defendant Eaton Corporation in the amount of $400, receipt number AMIWDC-5737559 (Ryan, Timothy)
September 25, 2020 Filing 2 ANSWER to complaint with affirmative defenses by Eaton Corporation (Ryan, Timothy)
September 25, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Kalamazoo County Circuit Court case number 20-0320-NZ filed by Eaton Corporation (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - State court Summons and Complaint, jury demand ) (Ryan, Timothy) Modified text on 9/28/2020 (mg).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Meave v. Eaton Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lua Meave
Represented By: Aaron D. Wiseley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eaton Corporation
Represented By: Timothy J. Ryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?