Bogseth #267079 v. Burt
| Brent William Bogseth #267079 |
| Sherry Burt |
| 1:2020cv00977 |
| October 13, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Sally J Berens |
| Janet T Neff |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
(NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Andrea M. Christensen-Brown on behalf of respondent Sherry Burt (Christensen-Brown, Andrea)
|
|
Filing 8
LETTER from Brent Bogseth #267079, regarding filing fee and requesting documents. Documents and copy of docket sheet mailed. (eod)
|
|
RECEIPT: filing fee in the amount of $ 5.00, receipt number GR072379 (mkc)
|
|
Filing 7
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE on behalf of Sherry Burt served on 10/26/2020, answer due 11/16/2020 (ndj)
|
|
SERVICE by CERTIFIED MAIL in a habeas action: copy of habeas petition and order to answer sent by certified mail, article number 7015 1520 0002 0362 6479 as to the Attorney General; Respondent Sherry Burt served via regular mail (mlc)
|
|
Copy of Order on Motion for Hearing, Order on Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis #5 , Order to Answer (Habeas), #6 sent via U.S. Mail to Brent William Bogseth (mlc)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER TO FILE ANSWER OR OTHER PLEADING: the Clerk to serve a copy of the petition and brief by regular mail on the respondent and one copy by certified mail on the Attorney General of the State of MI; respondent to answer the habeas petition within 180 days; no extensions will be granted; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, clb)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER denying #4 application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; denying without prejudice #2 motion for hearing; motion for discovery [3-3] is denied without prejudice; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, clb)
|
|
Filing 4
APPLICATION TO PROCEED without prepayment of fees and affidavit (Attachments: #1 Financial Docs) (ndj)
|
|
Filing 3
SUPPLEMENT re Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus #1 Objections by petitioner Brent William Bogseth #267079 (Attachments: #1 Verification, #2 Interrogatories, #3 Discovery) (ndj)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for hearing by petitioner Brent William Bogseth #267079; (Attachments: #1 attachment 1) (ndj)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for writ of habeas corpus filed by Brent William Bogseth #267079 (Attachments: #1 attachment 1, #2 attachment 2) (ndj)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bogseth #267079 v. Burt | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Sherry Burt | |
| Represented By: | Andrea M. Christensen-Brown |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Brent William Bogseth #267079 | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
