Workman v. Priority Health Managed Benefits, Inc. et al
| Candy Workman |
| Unknown Part(y)(ies) and Priority Health Managed Benefits, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv01114 |
| November 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Sally J Berens |
| Janet T Neff |
| Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendant Priority Health Managed Benefits, Inc. (ems) |
| Filing 3 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Edelman, Daniel) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Janet T. Neff (ems) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Class Action) against All Defendants filed by Candy Workman (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Edelman, Daniel) Modified text on 11/18/2020 (ems). |
| SUMMONS NOT ISSUED as to defendant Priority Health Managed Benefits, Inc. (proposed summons not provided) (ems) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Adam G. Taub on behalf of plaintiff Candy Workman (Taub, Adam) |
| FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff Candy Workman in the amount of $400, receipt number AMIWDC-5947979 (Edelman, Daniel) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Daniel A. Edelman on behalf of plaintiff Candy Workman (Edelman, Daniel) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Cathleen M. Combs on behalf of plaintiff Candy Workman (Combs, Cathleen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
