Olar #484342 v. Ritter et al
Daniel James Olar #484342 |
B. Hadden, Matt Macauley and Craig Ritter |
1:2020cv01159 |
December 2, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Hala Y Jarbou |
Ray Kent |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 JUDGMENT dismissing case without prejudice; signed by District Judge Hala Y. Jarbou (aks) |
Filing 3 ORDER DISMISSING CASE: for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with the Court's order; signed by District Judge Hala Y. Jarbou (aks) |
Certified Copy of Order Dismissing Case (no motion) #3 , Judgment Dismissing Case #4 sent via U.S. Mail to Daniel James Olar #484342 (mg) |
Filing 2 DEFICIENCY ORDER: plaintiff has failed to pay the filing fee or file the required documents to apply to proceed in forma pauperis; deficiency to be cured by 12/31/2020 or the action will be dismissed; signed by Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (fhw) |
Copy of Deficiency Order #2 sent via U.S. Mail to Daniel James Olar #484342 (ns) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with magistrate referral against B. Hadden, Matt Macauley, Craig Ritter filed by Daniel James Olar #484342 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7-8, #8 Exhibit 9) (ns) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.